Four Rolex Daytonas make £37.3m at Phillips in London
The one-off Cosmograph Daytonas sold individually on 28 September, raising $49.5m for the Federer Foundation and Re:wild. The set was conceived as a private sale at about $4.9m.
By Carat Capital
What changed
The private route closed. Rolex sent four one-off Daytonas to a public room instead of one buyer. They made £37.3m on 28 September, against about $4.9m as a private sale.
What it means
- If you value one-off watches: A public result exists where none did. £37.3m is a ceiling, not a clearing price.
- If you consign to charity: Phillips calls it the largest single charity consignment ever sold. The claim is the house's.
- What this is not: A comparable. Charity bidders buy a cause as well as a watch.
Key figures
| Four Daytonas, combined$49.5m at the reported rate | £37.3m |
|---|---|
| Summer, Everose gold — top lot | £10.3m |
| Spring, lowest of the four | £6.8m |
| Result against the private price$49.5m over about $4.9m, Carat Capital's division | 10.1× |
Source: Phillips, The Four Seasons, London, 28 September 2026 · reported by JCK 29 September · page read direct, 107,832 bytes
The sterling column is the price
Four lots, sold separately. Phillips offered the Daytonas one at a time, not as a set. Summer took £10.3m and Spring £6.8m; the four sterling prices add to £37.3m exactly.
The dollars do not. The four dollar conversions add to $49.37m against a reported $49.5m. Each lot converted at a lower rate than the headline total implies.
Sterling is the mark. The sale was struck in London in pounds. A dollar figure from it carries whichever rate the reporter used.
| Lot | Sterling | Dollars | Implied $/£ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summer, Everose gold | £10.3m | $13.65m | 1.3252 |
| Autumn | £10.2m | $13.52m | 1.3255 |
| Winter | £10.0m | $13.2m | 1.3200 |
| Spring | £6.8m | $9.0m | 1.3235 |
| Sum of the four | £37.3m | $49.37m | 1.3236 |
| Total as reported | £37.3m | $49.5m | 1.3271 |
Sterling and dollar figures are JCK's, on Phillips' account. The implied-rate column and the sum row are Carat Capital's arithmetic. The sterling column adds to the reported total exactly; the dollar column is $0.13m short of it, because the four lot conversions run at 1.3200 to 1.3255 and the headline total at 1.3271.
Ten times the private price
The set changed route. Carat Capital reported on 5 September that the four were conceived as a private sale to one buyer. The price then was about 4 million Swiss francs, or about $4.9m.
The multiple is ten. $49.5m against about $4.9m is about 10.1 times, on Carat Capital's division of two figures the same outlet supplied.
What the house claims
The superlative is Phillips'. JCK reports, on Phillips' account, that the total is the largest single consignment ever sold at a charity auction. No series of charity sales was checked here.
One total is contested. JCK gives $49.5m in its own copy and cites Hodinkee at $49.4m in the same article. The sterling figure appears once.
What to watch
- 7–8 NovemberPhillips' Geneva Watch Auction XXIV, where a 1945 Patek split-seconds carries a CHF 4m estimate.
- The next one-off RolexWhether a valuer cites £37.3m or a per-watch figure as the comparable.
- Any Phillips releaseAn itemised lot list, which would settle the dollar total.
The story so far
Go deeper
What would change this call
A published lot list from Phillips. The house's own results page for this sale could not be reached from this desk (a direct fetch returned 404), so every figure here is JCK's report of the house's account. A release giving four sterling prices and one dollar total would settle which conversion rate is the official one, and could move the dollar figure in either direction. An itemised list would also show whether all four sold or whether any carried a guarantee.
Why a charity result is not a comparable
Ordinary auction price discovery works because the bidder wants the object and nothing else, so the hammer measures what the object is worth to the most motivated buyer in the room. A charity sale breaks that. The bidder is buying the object, a donation, and the visibility of having made it, and only one of those three is a watch. When the beneficiaries are named charities founded by two of the consigning brand's own ambassadors, the third component is larger still, because the room contains people whose relationship with the brand is worth more than the lot. That is why a house can report a result like this one honestly and a valuer still cannot use it: the number is real, it was paid, and it prices something the next seller will not be offering. The useful reading is the one Carat Capital set out before the sale: treat it as a ceiling, note the setting, and keep the private figure as the commercial mark, because that was the only number here that somebody had to justify to a buyer who wanted the watches and not the applause.
Method
The item was read from JCK's report, fetched direct with a browser user agent, 200, 107,832 bytes to a saved file, with all prose taken from those raw bytes. Grepped in that saved file before anything was written: '49.5' returns 5 hits and '37.3' returns 2. The four lot prices, the Everose attribution on the Summer watch, the beneficiaries, the Bacs attribution, the Hodinkee $49.4m citation and JCK's own AI-drafting disclosure are all in the same body text. Phillips' own results page was attempted at phillips.com and returned 404, so the primary was not reached and the figures are cited at one remove; that limit is disclosed here rather than smoothed over. The implied-rate column, the $49.37m sum and the 10.1 multiple are Carat Capital's arithmetic on JCK's figures and are labelled as such wherever they appear. The $4.9m private figure and the 4 million Swiss francs beside it are JCK's, carried in this paper's own 5 September preview and quoted from it here rather than refetched. The archive was checked by reading every hit rather than counting: 'Daytona' returns five articles, all opened. One, 5 September 2026, covers the same four watches and the same sale as a pre-sale preview and states in terms that there was no published estimate; the period it covers is anticipation and the period covered here is the result, so the verdict is advanced, not a repeat. 'Federer' returns that same article and no other.
Sources
- Rolex Charity Auction Raises Nearly $50M, JCK 29 September 2026