Carat^Capital
Carat Capital · The trade paper of the jewelry world · Est. MMXXVI · Free to read
CC/09-05Saturday 5 September 2026The Auctions & Estates Desk · Charity sale
Charity saleAuctions & Estates · CC/09-05

Rolex sends 4 one-off Daytonas to Phillips on 28 September

The set was conceived for a single buyer at about $4.9 million before Rolex switched it to auction. Proceeds are split evenly between the Federer Foundation and Re:wild.

PLATE IThe number
4
Unique watches
one for each season
CHF 4mOriginal price
28 SepSale date
2Beneficiaries
Source Rolex, via JCK and SJX Watches - reported 3 and 4 September 2026
What changed

Rolex chose the room. Four one-off gem-set Daytonas go to Phillips in London on 28 September, after being conceived as a private sale to one buyer at about 4 million Swiss francs. Two charities split the proceeds.

What it means · The Desk’s View

If you estimate one-off Rolex: a public result is coming where there has never been one. Note it, then discount it.

If you are bidding: no estimate is published and the lotting is not stated.

What this is not: a comparable. Charity rooms do not discover market prices.

The article2 sections · 103 words
Table I - The four lotsReferences and metals as published by JCK, 4 September 2026
ReferenceMetalDial
126599 SAVL18ct white goldChrysoprase
126595 SARO18ct Everose goldTurquoise
126598 TML18ct yellow goldMookaite
126596 SABV950 platinumBlue opal
Source References and metals from JCK, 4 September 2026; dial materials from SJX Watches, 3 September 2026. Season names are not matched to references here, because no source read for this article maps the two directly.CC/2026/055

IA private sale that became public

One buyer was planned. The set was conceived as a private sale at approximately 4 million Swiss francs, about $4.9 million. Retailer feedback pointed to many more than one interested buyer.

Rolex rarely consigns. The brand makes almost no one-off watches and does not usually send them to a saleroom. The choice of a public room is the news.

IIWhat is not on the record

No estimate published. Phillips has not given an estimate for the four, and has not said whether they sell as one lot or separately. Both change what any result means.

Charity distorts price. Bidders in a charity room are buying a cause as well as a watch, so the number that results travels further than it deserves.

The depthMethod, sources, corrections · open what you need
01What would change this call+

Phillips publishing estimates close to the 4 million francs, and a result near them. That would make this ordinary price discovery rather than a charity premium, and the warning against using it as a comparable would soften.

02Why a charity result is not a comparable+

In a benefit sale the buyer receives a watch and, in many jurisdictions, a deduction, and is seen to support the cause. Bidding therefore contains a donation the catalogue never prices. Results from such rooms routinely exceed open-market levels for the same reference, which is why estimators discount them rather than enter them in a price series.

03Method · the desk’s arithmetic+

The 4 million Swiss francs and its approximate dollar equivalent of $4.9 million are JCK's figures, reported 4 September 2026, and are attributed rather than converted by this desk. References and metals are from the same report; dial materials are from SJX Watches, 3 September 2026. No source read for this article maps the four season names to the four references, so that mapping is left out rather than inferred. No estimate has been published for the lots.

04Sources2 documents
The Morning Brief · free

The trade, filed before the New York open.

Prices, tenders and the one story that moved the industry overnight. Ninety seconds.

Subscribe free →
Clarity, daily.