Carat^Capital
Carat Capital · The trade paper of the jewelry world · Est. MMXXVI · Free to read
Retail & Technology Desk - Price Boards

₹1,63,790 in Ahmedabad, Surat and Rajkot alike: one number, three cities

A Gujarati price board carried the identical 24-carat rate in all three cities on 27 August. The 22-carat and 18-carat figures are that number times 22/24 and 18/24, to the rupee. The month's gain is ₹17,850.

Engraving — CC graphics deskCC/08-29
By the numbers - the Gujarat board, 27 August, per 10 grams
₹1,63,790
24-carat, identical in all three cities
₹1,50,140
22-carat, which is 24-carat × 22/24
₹1,22,840
18-carat, which is 24-carat × 18/24
₹17,850
▲ +12.23% · added since 27 July
91.667%
the ratio that gives the trick away
WHAT THE BOARD PRINTS, AND WHAT THE ARITHMETIC GIVES24-CARAT, PRINTED₹1,63,79022-CARAT, PRINTED₹1,50,14024CT × 22/24₹1,50,140.8318-CARAT, PRINTED₹1,22,84024CT × 18/24₹1,22,842.50PER 10 GRAMS, 27 AUGUST 2026. PURE KARAT RATIO, ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TEN RUPEES
Plate I — Carat Capital graphics desk, arithmetic on the board's own figures.  CC/2026/048

§1One page, three cities, one number.

TV9 Gujarati published a gold and silver rate board on 27 August, bylined to Dhruval Shah and timestamped 9.45 in the morning, putting 24-carat gold at ₹1,63,790 for ten grams, 22-carat at ₹1,50,140 and 18-carat at ₹1,22,840. It gives those figures three times over, once each for Ahmedabad, Surat and Rajkot, and the three cities carry the identical number to the rupee. The page credits its data to Groww, an investment platform, and carries its own disclaimer that everything above it rests on media reports. This desk fetched the page directly and confirmed each figure and the date in the body text rather than in a listing.

§2Two of the three karats are division, not quotation.

Two of the three karat prices are not separate quotations. Multiply the 24-carat figure by 22/24 and the result is ₹1,50,140.83, which the board prints as ₹1,50,140. Multiply it by 18/24 and the result is ₹1,22,842.50, printed as ₹1,22,840. Both are the headline number divided by pure karat ratio and rounded to the nearest ten rupees, and neither carries the premium that a real 22-carat counter charges for alloy, wastage and making. A board that quotes three karats from one number is quoting one price, and a shopper comparing the 22-carat line against a jeweller's own 22-carat rate is comparing a division against a quotation.

Two of the three karat prices are not prices. They are division.

The Retail Desk

§3Separate markets, identical to the rupee.

The three cities behave the same way. Ahmedabad, Surat and Rajkot are separate markets with separate associations, separate local premiums and, on any given morning, different counters. A feed that returns the same rupee figure for all three is a national reference rate presented in a city-by-city format, not a survey of what any of the three actually charged. The board is not wrong about that; it says where its data comes from. It is the presentation that invites the wrong reading, and the wrong reading is the common one: that these are city prices and that the differences between them, or the absence of differences, mean something about local demand.

§4The trend is honest, and the date now matters.

What the board does carry honestly is the trend, and the trend has a date attached that matters more today than it did on Thursday. The same page puts the ten-day high at ₹1,64,020 on 24 August and the ten-day low at ₹1,55,020 on 19 August, a range of ₹9,000 or 5.81% of the low, and puts 27 July at ₹1,45,940 against 27 August at ₹1,63,790, a gain of ₹17,850 or 12.23% in a month. The 24 August peak is the same day this paper's own tape recorded its high-water mark for gold, $4,643.90, from an entirely separate source. Two independent series topping out on the same date is the useful confirmation in all of this. It is also why the board is now stale: gold fell 3.26% on Friday, after this reading was taken.

The Desk’s ViewRetail & Technology

Price boards like this one are how most Indian buyers meet the gold price, and they are read as retail quotations when they are aggregated reference rates with karat arithmetic laid on top. The test any reader can run takes ten seconds. If the 22-carat figure is exactly 91.667% of the 24-carat figure, nobody has surveyed a counter. A real 22-carat retail price sits above pure ratio, because alloy and making are charged for and because a jeweller's margin is not a fraction of purity.

None of this makes the board useless; ₹16,379 a gram on 27 August is a fair statement of where the national reference sat. It makes it a benchmark, and a benchmark two days old and a 3.26% session behind the market should be quoted as history, not as today's rate.

The Morning Brief · free

The trade, filed to your inbox before the New York open.

Prices, tenders and the one story that moved the industry overnight — read in ninety seconds.

Subscribe free →