Carat^Capital
Carat Capital · The trade paper of the jewelry world · Est. MMXXVI · Free to read
Diamonds Desk · The Aisle

Sixty-one percent: the aisle has already voted

The Knot's 2026 Real Weddings study finds 61% of couples who married in 2025 chose lab-grown center stones. Wholesale prices fell 14-15% in the first quarter; a premium one-carat lab stone now retails for $800-$1,200.

Plate — KUGEL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia CommonsCC
By the numbers · The Knot 2026 Real Weddings study and Q1 pricing
61%
▲ 2025 · LAB-GROWN CENTER STONES
−14–15%
▼ Y/Y · LG WHOLESALE, Q1 2026
$800–1,200
— RETAIL · PREMIUM 1CT LAB-GROWN
$5,232
— NAT1 · NATURAL 1CT, OUR TAPE
×4.4
— GAP · NATURAL PREMIUM, ROUGHLY
THE ONE-CARAT QUESTION · INDICATIVE DOLLARS PER STONENATURAL 1CT (TAPE PROXY)5,232PREMIUM LAB-GROWN 1CT, TOP1,200PREMIUM LAB-GROWN 1CT, LOW800THE GAP IS THE LUXURY ARGUMENT; THE GAP IS ALSO THE VALUE ARGUMENT
Plate I — Two products wearing one name. Carat Capital graphics desk.  CC/2026/091

§1The scoreboard reads 61.

The lab-grown debate has an official scoreboard now, and it is not close. According to The Knot's 2026 Real Weddings study, 61% of engagement rings bought by couples who married in 2025 carried lab-grown center stones. Whatever position a jeweler holds on the natural-versus-grown question, the American aisle has already voted, and it voted for the machine by a margin that would end most arguments.

§2Arithmetic, not compromise.

The economics underneath the number are brutal in one direction and liberating in the other. Lab-grown wholesale prices fell another 14-15% year over year in the first quarter of 2026. A premium one-carat lab-grown stone now retails between $800 and $1,200, with entry-level goods available for a few hundred dollars. For a generation, as the analyst Sherry Smith writes in National Jeweler, that is balancing a ring against homeownership, inflation and student debt, the choice stops feeling like a compromise and starts feeling like arithmetic.

Smith's larger argument is that the trade has framed the question wrong. The market is not either/or, she contends, but bifurcated: lab-grown owns value and accessibility, natural diamonds own luxury and rarity, and a retailer's job is building an environment where both can thrive rather than treating one as the other's obituary. She also names the uncomfortable truth behind the natural side's slide: the industry stopped telling its story, and today's engagement customer did not grow up with the campaigns that made the diamond a requirement in the first place.

A 61% share of a growing category is not the same as a 61% share of a fixed pie.
— The Demand Desk

§3What comes after the vote.

The scoreboard does not settle where prices go next. This desk reported last week that lab-grown wholesale has been finding a floor, with some categories firming for the first time in two years, even as retail prices keep drifting down. And the natural market's own data offered a countercurrent: one-carat natural prices have stirred, and De Beers' Gen Z research, whatever its methodology, claims record American interest in diamonds generally. A 61% share of a growing category is not the same as a 61% share of a fixed pie.

The Desk’s ViewDiamonds

The number that matters is not 61; it is whichever number comes next. If lab-grown's share plateaus here, the trade settles into Smith's bifurcation and both counters make money. If it keeps climbing, the natural engagement stone becomes what the mechanical watch became: a luxury object justified by meaning rather than convention.

The watch industry, it is worth noting, eventually found that trade rather profitable.

The Morning Brief · free

The trade, filed to your inbox before the New York open.

Prices, tenders and the one story that moved the industry overnight — read in ninety seconds.

Subscribe free →