Carat^Capital
Carat Capital · The trade paper of the jewelry world · Est. MMXXVI · Free to read
Diamonds Desk

Who buys diamonds now? The data says: not who the trade thinks

Average natural-diamond spend is up 25 percent to $4,063. Three-quarters of demand is non-bridal. Gen Z punches five points above its weight. The customer changed faster than the marketing did.

Engraving — CC graphics deskCC/07-07
By the numbers · De Beers US acquisition study
$4,063
▲ +25% · avg natural-diamond spend
75%
of demand by value non-bridal
23%
Gen Z value share (18% of pop.)
€16.5B
▲ +14% · Richemont jewellery maisons
€1.44T
global luxury spend, 2025
GEN Z & NATURAL DIAMONDS · PERCENTSHARE OF VALUE DEMAND23%SHARE OF POPULATION18%THE COHORT THE TRADE WROTE OFF PUNCHES FIVE POINTS ABOVE ITS WEIGHT
Plate I — Supposedly the lab-grown generation: Gen Z over-indexes on natural-diamond demand. Carat Capital graphics desk.  CC/2026/043

§1The founding assumption just retired.

De Beers' latest US Diamond Acquisition Study quietly retired the industry's founding assumption. The average spend on a natural-diamond piece rose twenty-five percent in two years, from $3,242 to $4,063 — but seventy-five percent of demand by value is now non-bridal. The engagement ring, the category's mythological center since 1947, is a quarter of the business. Self-purchase, anniversary, milestone and no-occasion gifting are the other three quarters.

§2The cohort the trade wrote off is over-indexing.

The generational data breaks the second assumption. Gen Z — supposedly the lab-grown generation, supposedly indifferent to mined stones — represents twenty-three percent of natural-diamond value demand while making up eighteen percent of the population. The cohort the trade wrote off is over-indexing, just not through the products or the messaging built for their parents: they arrive through vintage, through colored accents, through pieces with what Vegas trend-watchers this June called narrative — jewelry that tells a story rather than certifies a milestone.

§3The mid-market has not met its own customer.

The luxury macro agrees. Bain and Altagamma's spring study put global luxury spending at €1.44 trillion for 2025 with jewelry the leading category, growing ahead of handbags, watches and ready-to-wear. Richemont's fiscal year, closed in March, made it concrete: its Jewellery Maisons — Cartier, Van Cleef & Arpels, Buccellati — grew fourteen percent to €16.5 billion at a 30.5 percent operating margin, the most profitable large-scale jewelry business ever reported.

Read together, the numbers describe a customer the mid-market has not met: paying more per piece, buying outside bridal seasonality, younger than expected, and rewarding brand, design and story with fashion-like loyalty.

The branded houses and the estate market serve that customer; the anonymous three-stone-special middle does not — which is precisely where the US independents' data (tickets up twenty-two percent, units down nine) says the squeeze is landing.

The first mid-market retailer to rebuild its case plan around the seventy-five percent will look like a genius.
— The Demand Desk
The Desk’s ViewDiamonds

The trade spends its marketing budget re-arguing natural-versus-grown while the actual growth — non-bridal, self-purchase, Gen Z, story-led — goes underserved. The first mid-market retailer to rebuild its case plan around the seventy-five percent will look like a genius.

The data has been public for a month.

The Morning Brief · free

The trade, filed to your inbox before the New York open.

Prices, tenders and the one story that moved the industry overnight — read in ninety seconds.

Subscribe free →